DON’T FORGET: The tax deadline is fast approaching. Contact us to get started on your return today.

Michigan's Cannabis Tax Dispute: What It Means for You

In the latest development in cannabis legislation, Michigan is grappling with a significant policy challenge over a newly introduced 24% wholesale marijuana tax. This tax, already subject to a constitutional challenge, is positioned to impact both local and national tax landscapes. A recent court hearing has magnified the implications of this case, which could reshape not only cannabis pricing but also voter-approved legislative processes across the United States.

Whether you're part of the cannabis industry or a concerned citizen from another state, the outcome of this case carries weight. It could guide how states nationwide structure, amend, and defend their cannabis tax policies—offering a glimpse into the future of regulatory battles as the market continues its rapid expansion.

Image 3

Details of Michigan’s Proposed Cannabis Tax

As part of the 2025–2026 fiscal agenda, Michigan's legislators have enacted a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at generating funds for essential road improvements. This tax enters the fiscal picture earlier in the supply chain than existing taxes that consumers are familiar with, setting the stage for potentially significant implications.

Before this, Michigan's cannabis prices have been influenced by two taxes:

  • 10% excise tax on retail purchases, sanctioned by voters in 2018

  • 6% state sales tax, adding a further fiscal layer

Should this wholesale tax be enacted, Michigan could see one of the most complex cannabis tax structures in the nation.

Reasons Behind the Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has filed a lawsuit asserting the tax's unconstitutionality. Their argument hinges on a critical point: amendments to the user-approved 2018 marijuana law necessitate a supermajority vote.

The recreational cannabis provisions, birthed by the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), are shielded from change without a three-fourths legislative supermajority.

However, the wholesale tax passed with only a simple majority, spurring MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol to emphasize the paramount stakes. Tantraphol articulated, “As the foremost cannabis trade association, our mission in court is to uphold the determination of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Image 1

Industry experts caution that this tax could elevate operational costs, challenge small businesses financially, and inadvertently drive consumers towards unregulated market options—a phenomenon observed in high-tax states like California.

The State's Rationale

Michigan's government defends the legality of the tax based on several points:

  • The wholesale tax is introduced as new, not an alteration of the original 2018 voter-approved law

  • The legislature possesses the authority to establish taxes to accommodate budgetary needs

  • Its primary goal serves road infrastructure funding, not as a direct policy shift in cannabis regulation

Should the courts concur, the tax could begin implementation as of January 1, 2026.

Potential Impact on Consumers

This regulatory decision holds significance even for those far removed from Michigan, as state tax infrastructures frequently influence others. If the tax withstands judicial scrutiny:

  • Wholesale cannabis prices will likely climb

  • Retail prices may increase as businesses attempt to absorb costs

  • Consumers could increasingly resort to more affordable, yet illegal, markets

  • Smaller market participants might face consolidation pressures or exit

A repeal of the tax would maintain Michigan’s currently competitive national pricing, which is amongst the lower brackets.

Image 2

National Importance of the Case

Although Michigan anchors this legal debate, its repercussions may cascade nationwide.

1. Challenging Voter-Affirmed Legislative Practices

Should lawmakers circumvent voter-sanctioned models without supermajority consent, the measure could transform the dynamics of state ballot initiatives universally.

2. Influence on State Cannabis Tax Frameworks

Given Michigan's potential success, other states could consider analogous taxation methods amidst infrastructure budgetary deficits.

3. Highlighting National Cannabis Tax Diversity

States such as Oregon and Michigan uphold moderate cannabis taxes, promoting legal market vitality. Conversely, excessive taxation seen in locales like California is linked to robust illicit trade networks.

Michigan’s court case might sculpt a precedent for future tax litigation across the country.

Next Steps

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has deliberated on initial arguments and will soon announce a verdict. The matter could traverse up to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Regardless of the verdict, this legal decision holds pivotal implications—not merely for Michigan's cannabis enterprises, but potentially redefining how burgeoning industries, electoral laws, and tax authorities operate on a national stage.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.

PM Enterprises Inc We'd love to chat!
Please feel free to use our Ai chat assistant or contact us using the buttons below.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully